Neurodiversity at Hogrefe
A Publisher’s Perspective on Neurodiversity in Psychological Assessment
Contents
- Defining Neurodiversity
- Supporting Neurodiverse Strengths
- Embracing the Role of a Psychometric Publisher in Neurodiversity
- Exploring Research-Driven and Practical Challenges and Our Commitment to Overcoming Them
- Hogrefe’s Work: What Are We Doing to Work Toward Our Vision?
- Summary and Conclusion
- PDF download
- Author
- References
Defining Neurodiversity
Neurodiversity refers to the natural variation in cognitive functioning observed in all humans.
The term has its origins in the autism advocacy movement, which emphasizes that neurological diversity is a normal and healthy aspect of the human species (Singer, 1999). Neurodiversity is primarily associated with many neurodivergent conditions, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), dyslexia, dyspraxia, and dyscalculia (Goldberg, 2023). Neurodiversity as a concept challenges traditional deficit-based models that pathologize weaknesses and focus on developmental “deficits.” It does this by emphasizing the lifelong, positive aspects of cognitive differences, such as creativity, problem solving, or specialized skills that may be found in individuals with conditions like ASD or ADHD.
Neurodiversity at Hogrefe
Our company is dedicated to continuously improving neuroinclusion through our psychological assessments. We are actively working to understand the needs of the neurodiverse population, including those of neurotypical individuals, ensuring our products help individuals to develop and align their strengths and needs with educational and occupational requirements. Our focus is on providing a portfolio of psychological assessments that includes neurodiversity as an aspect of test fairness and considers specific neurodivergent conditions such as ASD, ADHD, and dyslexia also in assessments independent of diagnosis. By prioritizing the quality of our assessments with standardized methods and guidance for interpreting test results, we aim to provide a fair and accurate testing experience for all individuals. Through research at Hogrefe R&D we are gaining insights into neurodiversity from a psychometric perspective and continuously enhancing the fairness of our assessments for all.
Supporting Neurodiverse Strengths
Approximately 15–20% of the global population are neurodivergent.
However, societal structures – including within educational and occupational settings – often fail to accommodate these cognitive differences effectively. In the UK, for example, only 29% of autistic individuals are employed full-time, highlighting substantial barriers to workforce inclusion, where neurodivergent individuals in general face heightened risks of long-term unemployment (National Autistic Society, 2016). There is also a noted gap in education systems, where neurodivergent students are more likely to struggle with various aspects of learning. National and regional strategies aim to tackle discrepancies; however, a lack of resources is often cited as a major barrier to making schools more neuroinclusive.
Challenges of Neurodivergent Individuals Need to Be Addressed
Acknowledging neurodiversity as a general trait of individuals, separated from specific diagnoses, facilitates an understanding of an individual strengths and challenges, and allows an individual’s needs to be defined and built on their strengths. This concept of an individual approach to neurodivergent conditions is challenged by the categorical distinctions of disorders (A) provided by diagnostic systems and the heterogeneity of neurodivergent conditions (B) which is not being accounted for by simple diagnoses. These complexities underscore the importance of individual differences in recognizing and providing for individual needs, and for conceptualizing research to further understand neurodivergent conditions.
A) Highly co-occurring diagnostic categories and the limitations of current classification systems such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD), of the World Health Organization (WHO): For instance, approximately 40% of autistic individuals also have ADHD (Rong et al., 2021), and 14% may experience dyslexia (Hofvander et al., 2009). Similarly, nearly half (45%) of individuals with ADHD are likely to have a specific learning difficulty, such as dyslexia or dyscalculia (DuPaul et al., 2013), and 47% may face motor skill challenges (Farran et al., 2020). These high rates of co-occurrence reveal that the categorical distinctions provided by diagnostic systems frequently prove inadequate for capturing the intricate and multifaceted nature of neurodiversity.
B) High complexity and variability in diagnosing and treating neurodivergent conditions: The diagnostic criteria for ADHD in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR; APA, 2022) allow for 84 unique combinations of symptoms within the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive subtypes (Apperly et al., 2024), serving as only one example of the extensive variability between individuals who receive the same diagnosis and the heterogeneity within the neurodivergent population in general. This heterogeneity is also represented by experienced differences in treatment approaches. For example, applied behavioral analysis (ABA), used to support individuals on the autism spectrum, is often praised for improving language and communication skills (Yu et al., 2020). However, it has also been criticized as traumatic and abusive (Milton, 2018). Similarly, ADHD medications are valued for helping adults remain productive and maintain employment, but they are also stigmatized as widely abused amphetamines (Schwartz, 2016).
Strengths of Neurodivergent Individuals Need to Be Supported
Neurodiversity is important because, despite the challenges that neurodivergent individuals face in society, they can and do make meaningful contributions when their strengths are being recognized and supported. Supporting neurodiversity in an organization offers significant potential for the development of diverse cognitive styles, creative thinking, adaptability, and innovation. For example, in our Personality Insight Survey we found that neurodivergent individuals are more open to experiences, ideas, and aesthetics compared with neurotypical individuals. Cognitive diversity has been demonstrated to enhance teamwork performance. And time and again, neurodivergent employees have shown they may be capable of achieving outcomes far exceeding expectations, with the appropriate support, environment, or tools, and businesses may possess a “talent advantage” through the targeted recruitment of neurodivergent applicants (Austin & Pisano, 2017; Comaford, 2017)
Personality Insight Survey
The survey aimed to provide a thorough and nuanced understanding of adult personality across a globally representative sample of employed individuals, with a particular focus on those in leadership roles. Data were collected in 2022 and 2024, with strong representation from European countries affiliated with the Hogrefe Publishing Group. Eligible participants were fluent in English and employed either full- or part-time. The final sample included 967 individuals, balanced across gender, region, and job level (individual contributors, managers, and senior managers). Participants completed the NEO-PI-3 questionnaire and responded to additional questions on demographics, work attitudes, and neurodiversity. A key finding was that neurodivergent individuals scored significantly higher in openness – especially regarding new experiences, ideas, and aesthetics – compared to neurotypical individuals.
To overcome challenges and benefit from the strengths of neurodiversity, it is essential that decision makers are equipped with the appropriate tools, such as psychological assessments, to identify and address the needs of each individual, regardless of whether that individual is neurodivergent or neurotypical.
Embracing the Role of a Psychometric Publisher in Neurodiversity
We Support Neurodiversity With Scientifically Sound Assessments …
… For Professionals in Human Resource Contexts
Psychological assessments are a powerful tool for evaluating job candidates, and offering insights that go beyond traditional hiring methods. They help identify a candidate's strengths, such as problem solving, intelligence, and leadership potential, which may not be evident from interviews or resumes. Psychological assessments also provide valuable information about a candidate's beliefs, attitudes, and motivations, helping employers to understand what drives them and how well they align with organizational values. Assessments can help match candidates’ strengths and personality traits with the requirements of a role, ensuring a better person–job fit.
Furthermore, they can highlight to the employer where there may be specific strengths which can enhance job performance, thereby providing more of an emphasis on job–person fit. Importantly, these tools offer predictive insights into future job performance, helping employers to make data-driven decisions and to identify potential challenges that candidates may face in the workplace. Recognizing these challenges early allows employers to provide targeted support or training, reducing the risk of performance issues. Hogrefe's extensive product portfolio offers a wide range of tools that are highly relevant for different selection processes and requirements, providing valuable insights that traditional hiring methods may overlook. For an overview go to our website to find information in our Hogrefe Consulting brochure.
By identifying strengths, uncovering motivations, and looking at candidates’ profiles in relation to job requirements, the variety of tools and high-quality consulting services provided by Hogrefe through its consulting division, Hogrefe Consulting, enhances hiring fairness and effectiveness, ultimately contributing to both individual and organizational success.
… For Professionals Specializing in Child and Adolescent Development
Psychological assessments are of great importance in the understanding of the learning needs and development of children and adolescents. They evaluate key cognitive processes, such as memory, attention, and executive functioning, which are critical for academic success. Furthermore, these assessments can identify conditions such as ASD, ADHD, or dyslexia, enabling the development of personalized educational strategies and accommodations. Behavioral issues in children often stem from emotional or cognitive difficulties. Psychological assessments are an effective means of identifying the root causes such as anxiety, trauma, or impulse control issues. They offer insights into how to create supportive environments and establish strategies to nurture growth in children. In addition, this insight allows for the implementation of tailored interventions or accommodations that address specific problems. Psychological assessments also assist children and adolescents in comprehending their own strengths and capabilities, empowering them to advocate for their own needs. This enhanced self-awareness contributes to greater confidence and a more positive self-image.
With a test portfolio covering the wide spectrum of developmentally relevant traits and skills, Hogrefe provides a comprehensive approach to supporting the development of children and adolescents. In addition to diagnosing specific conditions, we help to understand each individual as a whole. This helps to identify strengths, address learning and behavioral challenges, foster self-awareness, and offer practical guidance to caregivers and educators. For an overview go to our website.
Exploring Research-Guided Practical Challenges and Our Commitment to Overcoming Them
While understanding neurodiversity has brought much-needed attention to the strengths and unique contributions of individuals with neurodivergent conditions, it is essential to consider the broader implications of this concept, especially when publishing and interpreting psychological assessments.
As psychological test publishers, we recognize the importance of promoting neurodiversity while addressing these challenges. By carefully considering them, we aim to develop tools and assessments that support inclusivity, foster mutual understanding, and provide actionable insights for individuals, educators, and employers alike.
Research-Guided Practical Challenges
Recent research on neurodiversity highlights the link between neurodivergence and neurotypicality, how individual views on disabilities matter, and the shift toward spectrum-based and dimensional models when describing neurodivergent conditions (C). Additionally, research uncovers the necessity of workplace support systems (D). These insights present a compelling case for test publishers to innovate with tools that are inclusive, dynamic, actionable, and which contribute to the scientific understanding of neurodiversity. Tools offered by Hogrefe help to support this nuanced approach to neurodivergent conditions and foster inclusive and supportive work environments, by informing tailored support systems (see Hogrefe Consulting).
C) Understanding neurodiversity:
Research on neurodiversity highlights the importance of individual beliefs and attitudes about disabilities in shaping workplace behaviors. The biopsychosocial model by Whelpley et al. (2023) offers a holistic view, integrating medical diagnoses, personal differences, and broader contexts. Maynard (2024) emphasizes the interwoven nature of neurodiversity and neurotypicality, framing them as dimensions on a shared spectrum. This perspective challenges rigid categorization and advocates for more inclusive psychological assessments. A shift toward understanding neurodivergent traits as part of a phenotypic spectrum shared by all is proposed by Apperly et al. (2024). This transdiagnostic framework positions neurominorities at the spectrum’s extremes, necessitating assessments that capture traits along a continuum.
D) Supporting employees:
In workplaces, tailored support systems for neurodivergent employees are increasingly vital. Studies (e.g., Austin & Pisano, 2017; Cherewick & Matergia, 2024; Ortiz, 2020) point to a gap in helping these employees identify and leverage their strengths (Kersten et al., 2024). Psychological assessments can bridge this gap, fostering inclusive and supportive work environments.
Practical Challenges
One potential risk is in inadvertently downplaying the needs of individuals with severe symptoms or high support requirements (Green, 2023). By emphasizing strengths, there may be a diminished focus on the genuine difficulties some individuals face, particularly those with significant communication barriers or daily functional challenges. This could result in individuals with severe symptoms or high support requirements feeling that their challenges are invalidated, which may lead to a reduction in recognition of their needs. To overcome this potential challenge, we are not only committed to advancing neuroinclusion by ensuring test fairness in assessments independent of diagnosis, but also focus on the ongoing development and improvement of psychological assessment tools that accurately identify the severity of symptoms and effectively diagnose difficulties and disabilities at early stages.
Hogrefe’s Work: What Are We Doing to Work Toward Our Vision?
As a forward-thinking publisher of psychological assessments, we recognize the critical importance of addressing neurodiversity in the development, standardization, and interpretation of testing procedures.
By adopting an inclusive and scientifically sound approach, we ensure that our tests meet the needs of diverse populations while fostering diagnostic precision and practical relevance.
Incorporating Neurodivergent Populations in Test Development
- To develop tests that are suitable for neurodivergent individuals, we place strong emphasis on obtaining both qualitative and quantitative feedback from this population. Direct engagement with neurodivergent individuals ensures that developed items reflect their experiences, abilities, and challenges. This iterative process enhances content validity and inclusivity, minimizing bias that might otherwise undermine the accuracy and validity of the results.
- Our commitment to inclusivity extends to the standardization phase, where we ensure that neurodivergent individuals are adequately represented in the normative sample. By doing so, we provide normative benchmarks that account for a broader range of cognitive and behavioral profiles, facilitating fair and meaningful comparisons across individuals.
- We aim to support and promote differential diagnoses, particularly in clinical contexts. Our tools are designed not only to support accurate identification of neurodivergent conditions but also to differentiate between overlapping clinical presentations. This approach supports tailored interventions and personalized pathways for support and treatment.
Strategic Alignment With Advances in Neurodiversity Research
Our strategy aligns with contemporary advancements in understanding neurodiversity and related disorders. Moving beyond categorical diagnoses and considering the high comorbidity of neurodivergent conditions, we integrate frameworks that promote dimensional, profile-based approaches and additionally provide tools for differential diagnoses. For example, our new Diagnostic Interview for Personality Pathology in ICD, 11th revision (ICD-11; WHO, 2019; DIPP-11; Bach & Sellbom, in preparation) is a semi structured clinical interview for personality disorders based on the ICD-11 that allows rating personality traits and disorders on a continuous spectrum. Furthermore, our instruments, such as the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 (IDS2; Grob & Hagmann-von Arx, 2018) facilitate the creation of comprehensive cognitive and behavioral profiles, in addition to the assessment of strict diagnostic values. These profiles not only address diagnostic needs but also provide actionable insights for further assessment and intervention. With the ATENTO (SánchezSánchez & Solar, 2024), we offer a modern assessment for diagnosing ADHD, while providing a comprehensive profile of executive and attentional functioning and indicating risks for ASD related traits.
Needs-Based Development Through Practitioner Collaboration
We maintain an ongoing dialogue with practitioners and actively gather practical needs from the field. By systematically implementing this feedback, we ensure that our products remain relevant, user-centered, and adaptable to real-world applications. This collaborative exchange guarantees that our assessments meet the demands of diverse professional contexts.
Research and Innovation in Test Formats
As part of our ongoing research commitment, we explore innovative item and test formats to better serve neurodivergent individuals. This includes:
- State of the art test development: We question traditional item formats and research new methods to increase reliability and validity making careful consideration of the neurodivergent population.
- AI-based test systems: We invest in research and development of AI-enhanced tools to advance assessment precision and personalization.
- Flexible and modular test systems: We design flexible testing frameworks that can be tailored to address specific questions, ensuring maximum relevance for diverse assessment purposes.
- While we embrace innovation, we continue to uphold classical psychometric quality criteria (e.g., reliability, validity) to ensure that conclusions drawn from our tests remain robust, consistent, and scientifically sound.
Summary and Conclusion
At Hogrefe, we are dedicated to advancing neuroinclusion through innovative psychological assessments that recognize and celebrate the strengths of neurodivergent individuals. Our approach moves beyond traditional deficit-focused models, embracing the complexity and individuality of neurodivergent conditions.
By incorporating neurodiverse perspectives into test development and aligning with cutting-edge research, we ensure that our tools are fair, inclusive, and scientifically robust. Our goal is to empower individuals, educators, and organizations to understand and support neurodiverse strengths, fostering personal growth, workplace success, and societal inclusion. Through ongoing collaboration, research and innovation, we strive to contribute to the scientific literature and understanding of neurodiversity in psychological assessments.
© 2025 Hogrefe Publishing Group
PDF download
Author
R&D Dept.
Dr. Kilian Hasselhorn
- Send email
- R&D@hogrefe.com
Merkelstr. 3
37085 GöttingenGermany
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR).
Apperly, I. A., Lee, R., Van Der Kleij, S. W., & Devine, R. T. (2024). A transdiagnostic approach to neurodiversity in a representative population sample: The N+ 4 model. JCPP Advances, 4(2), e12219. doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12219
Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96–103.
Bach, B. & Sellbom, M. (in preparation). DIPP-11 – Diagnostic Interview for Personality Pathology in ICD-11. Hogrefe
Cherewick, M., & Matergia, M. (2024). Neurodiversity in practice: A conceptual model of autistic strengths and potential mechanisms of change to support positive mental health and wellbeing in autistic children and adolescents. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 8(3), 08–422. doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00348-z
Comaford, C. (2017). Is neurodiversity the right talent path for your organization? Forbes.
DuPaul, G. J., Gormley, M. J., & Laracy, S. D. (2013). Comorbidity of LD and ADHD: Implications of DSM-5 for assessment and treatment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1), 43–51. doi.org/10.1177/0022219412464351
Farran, E., Bowler, A., D’Souza, H., Mayall, L., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Sumner, E., Brady, D., & Hill, E. (2020). Is the motor impairment in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) a co-occurring deficit or a phenotypic characteristic? Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4. doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00159-6
Goldberg, H. (2023). Unraveling neurodiversity: Insights from neuroscientific perspectives. Encyclopedia, 3(3), 972–980. doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030070
Green, J. (2023). Debate: Neurodiversity, autism and healthcare. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 28(3), 438–442. doi.org/10.1111/camh.12663
Grob, A., & Hagmann-von Arx, P. (2018). IDS-2 - Intelligence and Development Scales - 2. Hogrefe.
Hofvander, B., Delorme, R., Chaste, P., Nydén, A., Wentz, E., Ståhlberg, O., Herbrecht, E., Stopin, A., Anckarsäter, H., Gillberg, C., Rastam, M., & Leboyer, M. (2009). Psychiatric and psychosocial problem in adults with normal intelligence autism spectrum disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 9(35), 3. doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-9-35
Kersten, A., Scholz, F., Van Woerkom, M., Krabbenborg, M., & Smeets, L. (2024). A strengths-based human resource management approach to neurodiversity: A multi-actor qualitative study. Human Resource Management, 0, 1–17. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22261
Maynard, D. W. (2024). The human spectrum: A critique of “neurodiversity”. Symbolic Interaction, 48(1). 91–122. doi.org/10.1002/symb.691
Milton, D. A. (2018). A critique of the use of applied behavioral analysis (ABA): On behalf of the Neurodiversity Manifesto Steering Group [Internet article]. kar.kent.ac.uk/69268/
National Autistic Society. (2016, October 27). Government must tackle the autism employment gap. www.autism.org.uk/what-we-do/news/government-must-tackle-the-autism-employment-gap
Ortiz, L. A. (2020). Reframing neurodiversity as competitive advantage: Opportunities, challenges, and resources for business and professional communication educators. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 261–284. doi.org/10.1177/2329490620944456
Rong, Y., Yang, C.-J., Jin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 83, 101759. doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101759
Sánchez-Sánchez, F. & Solar, M. (2024). ATENTO. Cuestionario para la Evaluación de las Funciones Ejecutivas y el TDAH. Manual de aplicación, corrección e interpretación. Madrid: Hogrefe TEA Ediciones. Schwartz, C. (2016, October 16). Generation Adderall. New York Times Magazine. www.nytimes.com/2016/10/16/magazine/generation-adderall-addiction.html
Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse. Open University Press.
Whelpley, C. E., Holladay-Sandidge, H. D., Woznyj, H. M., & Banks, G. C. (2023). The biopsychosocial model and neurodiversity: A person-centered approach. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25–30. doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.95
World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11).
Yu, Q., Li, E., Li, L., & Liang, W. (2020). Efficacy of interventions based on applied behavior analysis for autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(5), 432–443. doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.0229